Heres some visuals from the BBC simplifying some of the changes made to the NHS:
Running of the NHS:
Who plans and buys treatments?
Who directs funding?
Overall structure:
Sunday, 23 June 2013
Clinical observations
I always check patients' bedside observations before starting any oral trials/ before a swallow assessment, so i thought i'd revise the norms:
Observation
|
Normal range
|
Indications if abnormal
|
Temperature (degrees C)
|
36.5 – 37.2 Deg. C.
|
High – may indicate a fever/
pneumonia/ infection.
Low - hypothermia
|
Pulse rate (beats per min)
|
60 – 100 beats per min
|
Fast – may indicate an
infection or dehydration.
|
Respiration rate (breaths per
min)
|
15 – 20 breaths per min
|
Above 25 – high may indicate
an infection/ bleeding/ lung or heart disorder.
|
Systolic blood pressure (mmHG)
– artery pressure when the heart contracts
Diastolic BP – artery pressure
when the heart is at rest
|
<120 mmHG - Systolic
<80 mmHG -
diastolic
|
High BP – increased risk of
stroke
Low BP – risk of fainting
|
O2 Saturation (SPO2) – oxygen
level in the blood
|
Low SPO2 (below 90) – can lead
to respiratory failure
|
Wednesday, 12 June 2013
Great video about using twitter professionally by Nicola Botting
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko2RoSbtF5U&feature=youtube_gdata&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko2RoSbtF5U&feature=youtube_gdata&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
Tuesday, 11 June 2013
Dysphagia readings: Assessment
Huckerbee Ch4
·
No clear association between the site of lesion
and dysphagia presentation.
·
Dysphagia occurs in a high proportion of stroke
patients (30%?)
·
Clinical swallowing examination is therefore the
first step in evaluating all stroke patients.
Patient History
·
Medical
History form patient records – medical charts, : Stroke onset,
characteristics and complications associated with stroke (e.g. intubation).
·
History of dysphagia – do they have this?
·
Patient
interview – rehabilitation setting will warrant a lengthier interview than
acute. Find out if swallowing has changed, if different on different
consistencies. Initially open ended – may ask more closed questions if the
patient has cognitive/comm. Diff.
·
Less than 50% of stroke patients are aware of
dysphagia symptoms – limitations of
interview.
Groher CH 7
Clinical examination of swallowing (CED) = description of
problem, health history, clinical observations and a physical examination.
Warning signs (dysphagia likely):
1.
Confused
mental state – may be difficulties with the eating process since requires
planning + judgement e.g. speaking while eating, going too quickly, large
bolus’.
2.
Dysarthria
(slow, labored, slurred articulation, nasal emission, hoarse/breathy voice) =
due to inherent weakness/ incoordination of muscles common to swallowing.
3.
Excessive
drooling (sialorrhea) – due to motor/sensory impairments of swallowing
mechanism.
4.
Frequent
coughing episodes – sign of potential aspiration – i.e. pooling into the
airway.(protective mechanism to prevent aspiration). – no cough reflex = sign
that most foods may be unsafe unless the patient is dysphraxic + has no
voluntary cough.
5. Weightloss
6.
Complaints
of pain/ obstruction – common complaint of those with neurologic condition
resulting in muscle weakness/ incoordination + those with oesophageal motility
disorders. Cricopharyngeal dysfunction – often point to the thyroid cartilage
level. Pooling in valleculae/ pyriforms – may point to area adjacent to the
larynx. Timing – if early – may be oropharyngeal – if later – oesophageal
problem.
7.
History
of pneumonia – may be associated with neuromuscular incoordination,
weakness of the oropharyngeal swallowing mechanism or esophageal dysfunction.
Clinical observations
·
Mental status –
·
Physical examination:
·
Voice and speech – e.g. ability to sustain a
vowel (quality,pitch, intensity) – Hyper-nasality suggests impaired
palatopharyngeal function.
·
Weight – nutrition?
·
Muscles of facial expression
·
Muscles of mastication – masseter is the largest
(inserts into the mandible), temporalis -
jaw up/ forward/back.
·
Pathologic reflexes e.g. brainstem reflexes –
normally inhibited in adults e.g. the bite reflex – often elicited in those
with severe neurologic lesions by touching the tongue, teeth or lips with a
tongue blade.
·
Oral mucosa – moisture?
·
Dentition
·
Gag reflex – very variable – diminished reflex
is significant in patients with
weakened pharyngeal musculature
·
Tongue – coordinated interaction between the
tongue and the pharyngeal muscles propels the bolus. Look for atrophy,
fasciculations or abnormal reflexes.
·
Sensation – chewing/saliva flow and swallowing =
reflexes depending on sensation.
Swallow summary
1.
Bolus moved into the oropharynx by
lip/tongue/cheek muscles
2.
Swallow reflex initiated
3.
Muscles suspending the larynx contract – larynx
moves up so that the epiglottis can go down into the base of tongue (covering
airway).
4.
Pharyngeal constrictors move the bolus towards
the cricopharyngeal sphincter muscle. Which opens allowing the bolus to travel
to the oesophagus.
Swallowing Assessment
·
Swallowing reflexes are subject to warm up and
fatigue.
·
Aspiration is difficult to evaluate – listen for
air mixing with liquid as a sign of aspiration. Change in face colour, gurgily
breath signs, breathiness or loss of voice may indicate acute aspiration
·
Examine the oral cavity for residue.
·
Ice chips = safe + give sensory stimulus
Logemann chapter 5
Oral –motor control
examination
·
Evaluation of the range rate and accuracy of movements of the lips, tongue, soft
palate and pharyngeal walls during speech, reflexive activity and swallowing.
·
Swallowing apraxia – usually perform best when
no swallowing instructions are given
·
Labial function - /i/ /u/ alternately, drooling/
anterior loss?
·
Tongue – touch mouth corners/ lips + then rapid
tongue movement. Posterior tongue function (tongue base) – get patient to say
/k/ + repeat /ka/ (DDK).
·
Soft palate – ask patient to produce a strong
loud ‘ah’ and to sustain this for a few seconds.
·
Oral sensation - use an oral sponge – ask the patient if everywhere feels
the same
Laryngeal examination
·
Voice quality – gurgily voice = associated with
aspiration, hoarsness – may indicate reduced laryngeal closure – cough reflex
(although voluntary cough doesn’t mean the patient will have a reflexive
cough).
·
Ability to change pitch – pharyngeal swallow +
cough reflex may arise from the superior laryngeal nerve – therefore inability
to change pitch implies reduced sensitivity around the larynx. Phonation time
tasks – info on laryngeal control – e.g. /z/ prolong a /z/ as long as possible.
Phonation time = also a test of respiration.
The Swallowing
Examination
Observations during
swallowing trial
·
Hand under the patients’ chin with fingers
spread and in light contact: index finger behind mandible, middle finger on
hyoid, little finger at the bottom of the thyroid cartilage.
·
Feel for: tongue movement, hyoid movement, and
laryngeal movement. Compare the time between the initiation of tongue movement
and the initiation of hyoid/ laryngeal movement.
·
Can’t assess what is occurring physiologically.
·
Ask patient to say ‘ah’ after swallowing –
listen to vocal quality. (however consider silent aspiration, potentially 50%).
·
Ask patient to pant + turn head to either side
after swallowing – material dislodged from the pharyngeal recesses – and then
say ‘ah’.
·
Use small amounts of material
Monday, 10 June 2013
Enteral Feeding Script
……. Has not been alert enough or able to
follow the instructions required for a full swallow examination. As she has
been in hospital for over a month and has not been able to participate in
assessment she is likely to need enteral (artificial) feeding in the long term.
If ….. becomes more alert the speech and language therapist will assess her
swallowing and start to develop a therapy program.
There are two main types of enteral
feeding, Naso-gastric feeding and PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy)
feeding.
Advantages
and disadvantages
Naso-gastric
feeding
|
PEG
Feeding
|
Advantages
|
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
Disadvantages
-
|
We have recommended PEG feeding because: 1.
…. Has removed her NG-tubes multiple times and has been unable to receive
nutrition/ medication when the tube is not in place. 2. No constraints e.g. the
mittens, need to be used so the patient is free to use her left hand in
therapy/ to communicate and 3. The PEG can be used in the long term.
Locked in syndrome
1. Think of a recent therapy session or event.
I assessed a patient who
had locked in syndrome (quadriplegic, with bilateral vocal fold palsy. Some
movement in his right index finger and thumb. All due to multiple brainstem and
cerebellar infarcts). I called his previous hospital for a handover and
contacted therapists at the specialist AAC centre in Putney for advice on his
access to communication.
2. Describe the session/experience
The patient had been extensively
assessed throughout his time in hospital, so I made sure to get a detailed
handover. I have little experience using AAC so I contacted specialists in
Putney. They advised that I look at the following: a) Consistent yes/no
response, b) cognition, c) What movements can he do consistently, d)
comprehension, e) cranial nerves. They also advised that I keep a diary for the
patient so that his family and staff can record his behaviours and note down
what he does in his day, for use in SLT e.g. did you… how was physio … It was
advised that I create clear communication guidelines for the patient and assess
for a baseline. The therapists recommended using an AEIOU alphabet chart.
During my session I 1)
asked the patient 1-2 stage instructions, 2) explained my role and the
information I had on him 3) Trialled use of the alphabet chart. The patient was
consistent with head nodding/ shaking for a yes/ no response. It was effortful
for both of us to use the alphabet chart. I followed advice from Putney and modelled
spelling out items using the alphabet chart. The patient engaged with this.
3. What did this session make you feel?
I felt exhausted from
concentrating on the patients communication attempts (mouthing, breathy speech,
jerky body movements, head nodding/shaking, alphabet chart use). I felt that by
keeping assessment functional e.g. giving instructions relating to an oro-motor
exam and asking about pain/ comfort the patient stayed engaged in my session.
It was reported that he quickly became disengaged in communication sessions due
to the effort fullness of communication.
4. What would you want to change, and why?
I would ideally have
talked to the patient’s family to ask them for some yes/no questions that are
engaging for the patient. I would also have done a joint session with the OT
around what movements may be harnessed for AAC use.
5. What has this session has taught you?
Look for a consistent yes/
no responses, think about low tech accessible forms of AAC, continue to
empathise with patients and explain the goals of my assessments in order to
motivate them for assessment.
6. What do you need to learn or find out before the next event?
More information about AAC
and communication with locked- in patients.
Putney
advice
·
Use errorless learning when teaching AAC use
e.g. with the AEIOU alphabet chart. E.g. we are going to spell tree…
·
Patients normally pick up alphabet chart use if
they have no cognitive impairments – it may be a sign of impairment if they
have ++ difficulties.
·
Have joint sessions with OT’s re – big mac or
switch use.
·
Start with a nurse call – big mac = good prep
for Phigh tech AAC since switch use is a pre-requisite for eye gaze etc..
·
Make sure Yes/ no is reliable + staff
consistently ask for the same response.
·
Using a diary is a good way to engage with
family members/ find material for communication sessions.
·
What commands can they follow?
·
Establish a clear baseline.
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
||
E
|
F
|
G
|
H
|
||
I
|
J
|
K
|
L
|
M
|
N
|
O
|
P
|
Q
|
R
|
S
|
T
|
U
|
V
|
W
|
X
|
Y
|
Z
|
Purpose
To help John
communicate information that he is unable to convey using mouthing, body
language, eye pointing and head nodding/ shaking. The alphabet is split into
rows so that communication partners don’t need to read out the whole alphabet.
The letters are in alphabetical order making communication quicker and thereby
reducing the burden on Johns’ sight.
How to use the
alphabet board
1. Ask John to think of the first letter of
the word he wishes to spell and to look at the row this letter is in.
2. Confirm the row as either A, E, I, O or U,
looking for a head nod on the correct row.
3. Ask John to nod when you say the correct
letter, and then proceed to read out the letters in the row.
4. Write down the letters John chooses and
confirm his responses.
Communication
method
|
YES
|
NO
|
Head
|
Nod
|
Shake
|
Thumb/
finger
|
Moves up/out
|
Moves down/in
|
|
Eyes looks up
Eyes Look to one side
Look to a YES card
|
Eyes looks down
Look to the
other side
Look to a NO
card
|
Blinks
|
One long
blink
|
Two short
blinks
|
Eyebrows
|
Raised
|
Lowered
|
Switch
|
Pressed once
|
Pressed
twice
|
Aim for the most natural method, the clearest
and the easiest to perform. + that everyone uses the same method. If the
patient is well supported and comfortable they are more likely to be able to
make a consistent response.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)